Skip to content
CMO & CTO
CMO & CTO

Closing the Bridge Between Marketing and Technology, By Luis Fernandez

  • Digital Experience
    • Experience Strategy
    • Experience-Driven Commerce
    • Multi-Channel Experience
    • Personalization & Targeting
    • SEO & Performance
    • User Journey & Behavior
  • Marketing Technologies
    • Analytics & Measurement
    • Content Management Systems
    • Customer Data Platforms
    • Digital Asset Management
    • Marketing Automation
    • MarTech Stack & Strategy
    • Technology Buying & ROI
  • Software Engineering
    • Software Engineering
    • Software Architecture
    • General Software
    • Development Practices
    • Productivity & Workflow
    • Code
    • Engineering Management
    • Business of Software
    • Code
    • Digital Transformation
    • Systems Thinking
    • Technical Implementation
  • About
CMO & CTO

Closing the Bridge Between Marketing and Technology, By Luis Fernandez

Migrating Ant to Maven: A Practical Path

Posted on August 7, 2011 By Luis Fernandez
\n

I remember a Friday night release where our Ant build ran fine on my laptop and blew up on the build server. A jar crept into lib/ locally and never made it to source control. We shipped late, and someone swore the build fairy was cursed. That was the push we needed. We started asking a simple question: what if the build had a brain, knew its dependencies, and behaved the same for everyone. That question leads straight to Maven.

\n\n\n\n

Why move from Ant to Maven right now

\n\n\n\n

Ant is a toolbox. You can build anything, and teams usually do. The price is a pile of custom targets and homegrown rules. Maven brings a project object model and convention over configuration, which sounds fancy but it just means less glue code and fewer surprises. You get dependency management out of the box, a standard directory layout, and a clear lifecycle with phases like compile, test, package, and install. With Maven 3 out and stable, builds are quicker and feel less fragile than the older days. The big win is repeatable builds that match across laptops, CI, and production packaging.

\n\n\n\n

The other reason is social. Most open source Java projects today publish Maven coordinates. Pulling in libraries with groupId, artifactId, and version beats hunting down jars and juggling a fat lib/ folder. Repository managers like Nexus and Artifactory are common in teams, so sharing snapshots and releases is no longer a game of copy and pray. If you are moving to Git or sticking with Subversion, keeping binary blobs out of the repo is cleaner, faster, and more traceable. Your build script becomes a small recipe, not a grab bag of bash and Ant magic.

\n\n\n\n

Practical steps to migrate without breaking the week

\n\n\n\n

Start with an audit. Open build.xml and write down compile classpath jars, test jars, code generation, packaging, and any custom tasks. Move jars out of lib/ into Maven dependencies by finding proper coordinates in Central or your company repo. Bootstrap a project with mvn archetype:generate and keep the standard layout: src/main/java, src/test/java, src/main/resources. Map Ant targets to Maven phases. For example, your compile target maps to compile, your jar target maps to package. Custom copy steps usually live in the resources plugin or the assembly plugin.

\n\n\n\n
<!-- from Ant -->\n<target name="compile">\n  <javac srcdir="src" destdir="build/classes" classpathref="cp"/>\n</target>\n\n<!-- in Maven pom.xml -->\n<project>\n  <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>\n  <groupId>com.example</groupId>\n  <artifactId>app-core</artifactId>\n  <version>1.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>\n  <dependencies>\n    <dependency>\n      <groupId>junit</groupId>\n      <artifactId>junit</artifactId>\n      <version>4.8.2</version>\n      <scope>test</scope>\n    </dependency>\n  </dependencies>\n  <build>\n    <plugins>\n      <plugin>\n        <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>\n        <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>\n        <version>2.3.2</version>\n        <configuration>\n          <source>1.6</source>\n          <target>1.6</target>\n        </configuration>\n      </plugin>\n    </plugins>\n  </build>\n</project>
\n\n\n\n

Work feature by feature. First get compile green with all jars in the POM. Then wire tests, then package. Keep the Ant build in the repo while Maven learns the ropes. You can even call Ant from Maven through the antrun plugin for odd tasks like code generation or resource weaving. Remove each Ant target only when the Maven path produces the same artifact checksum. This staged approach calms nerves and gives the team a backout plan.

\n\n\n\n

Dealing with legacy quirks and modules

\n\n\n\n

If your app has many modules, create a parent POM to centralize versions and plugin config. Then add child modules with a parent reference. This gives you version alignment across the board and one place to set compiler level, encoding, and plugin versions. Use a company BOM through <dependencyManagement> to pin versions and avoid the classic jar soup problem. Do not pack everything into one mega module. Keep modules small and cohesive so the build stays fast and readable.

\n\n\n\n
<!-- parent pom.xml -->\n<project>\n  <groupId>com.example</groupId>\n  <artifactId>app-parent</artifactId>\n  <version>1.0.0-SNAPSHOT</version>\n  <packaging>pom</packaging>\n  <modules>\n    <module>app-core</module>\n    <module>app-web</module>\n  </modules>\n  <dependencyManagement>\n    <dependencies>\n      <dependency>\n        <groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>\n        <artifactId>slf4j-api</artifactId>\n        <version>1.6.1</version>\n      </dependency>\n    </dependencies>\n  </dependencyManagement>\n</project>
\n\n\n\n

For apps that ship a distribution, the assembly plugin or the shade plugin will replace Ant zip and jar merges. If you need a zip with config and scripts, an assembly descriptor mirrors old copy rules and keeps them declarative. For homegrown code generation, either bind the generator to the generate sources phase or run it through antrun while you refactor. Publishing to Nexus or Artifactory is a one time setup in settings.xml and then a simple mvn deploy. That flips the habit from throwing jars on a file share to traceable releases.

\n\n\n\n
<!-- assembly snippet -->\n<plugin>\n  <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>\n  <artifactId>maven-assembly-plugin</artifactId>\n  <version>2.2.1</version>\n  <configuration>\n    <descriptors>\n      <descriptor>src/assembly/dist.xml</descriptor>\n    </descriptors>\n  </configuration>\n  <executions>\n    <execution>\n      <phase>package</phase>\n      <goals><goal>single</goal></goals>\n    </execution>\n  </executions>\n</plugin>
\n\n\n\n

CI, team habits, and keeping builds sane

\n\n\n\n

The Jenkins and Hudson split is fresh and teams are picking sides. Both run Maven like champs. Set the job to call mvn clean verify and point it at a clean workspace. Cache the Maven local repo on the build node to avoid long first runs, and set a mirror in settings.xml to your internal repo manager. Add the maven enforcer plugin to pin Java and Maven versions so the build fails loud if someone uses a different JDK. Wire code coverage and static checks as plugins so they run the same on laptops and CI.

\n\n\n\n
# Jenkins Execute Shell step\nrm -rf ~/.m2/repository/com/example/app*\nmvn -q clean verify\nmvn -q deploy
\n\n\n\n

Ant fans often miss the freedom to wire any task anywhere. You still can, but now there is a common path that most projects share. That makes the build easier to read and easier to Google when something fails. Keep profiles few and clear for dev, test, and prod like needs. Do not bake environment secrets into the POM. Use settings and CI variables. Write down the migration ground rules in a short readme and add a mvn -v line at the top so new devs check their setup fast. Small touches like that keep you out of the old Friday night trap.

\n\n\n\n

Summary

\n\n\n\n

Moving from Ant to Maven is less about tools and more about repeatable builds, clear defaults, and sane sharing of artifacts. Start with an audit, map Ant targets to Maven phases, lean on plugins for packaging and checks, and keep the Ant script around while you switch piece by piece. Use a parent POM for modules, publish to a repo manager, and let Jenkins run the same steps your laptop runs. The result is fewer surprises, fewer late nights, and a build you can trust.

\n
Digital Transformation Productivity & Workflow Software Engineering

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post
  • Digital Experience (94)
    • Experience Strategy (19)
    • Experience-Driven Commerce (5)
    • Multi-Channel Experience (9)
    • Personalization & Targeting (21)
    • SEO & Performance (10)
  • Marketing Technologies (92)
    • Analytics & Measurement (14)
    • Content Management Systems (45)
    • Customer Data Platforms (4)
    • Digital Asset Management (8)
    • Marketing Automation (6)
    • MarTech Stack & Strategy (10)
    • Technology Buying & ROI (3)
  • Software Engineering (310)
    • Business of Software (20)
    • Code (30)
    • Development Practices (52)
    • Digital Transformation (21)
    • Engineering Management (25)
    • General Software (82)
    • Productivity & Workflow (30)
    • Software Architecture (85)
    • Technical Implementation (23)
  • 2025 (12)
  • 2024 (8)
  • 2023 (18)
  • 2022 (13)
  • 2021 (3)
  • 2020 (8)
  • 2019 (8)
  • 2018 (23)
  • 2017 (17)
  • 2016 (40)
  • 2015 (37)
  • 2014 (25)
  • 2013 (28)
  • 2012 (24)
  • 2011 (30)
  • 2010 (42)
  • 2009 (25)
  • 2008 (13)
  • 2007 (33)
  • 2006 (26)

Ab Testing Adobe Adobe Analytics Adobe Target AEM agile-methodologies Analytics architecture-patterns CDP CMS coding-practices content-marketing Content Supply Chain Conversion Optimization Core Web Vitals customer-education Customer Data Platform Customer Experience Customer Journey DAM Data Layer Data Unification documentation DXP Individualization java Martech metrics mobile-development Mobile First Multichannel Omnichannel Personalization product-strategy project-management Responsive Design Search Engine Optimization Segmentation seo spring Targeting Tracking user-experience User Journey web-development

©2025 CMO & CTO | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes